Informazioni generali
Call: EIC Pathfinder Challenges 2025
Tipo di azione: HORIZON EIC Grants
Deadline Model: single-stage
Panoramica del bilancio
Topic |
Budget 2025 |
Stages |
Opening Date |
Deadline |
HORIZON-EIC-2025-PATHFINDERCHALLENGES-01-01 - HORIZON-EIC HORIZON EIC Grants |
120000000 |
single-stage |
2025-07-24 |
2025-10-29 |
HORIZON-EIC-2025-PATHFINDERCHALLENGES-01-03 - HORIZON-EIC HORIZON EIC Grants |
120000000 |
single-stage |
2025-07-24 |
2025-10-29 |
HORIZON-EIC-2025-PATHFINDERCHALLENGES-01-02 - HORIZON-EIC HORIZON EIC Grants |
120000000 |
single-stage |
2025-07-24 |
2025-10-29 |
HORIZON-EIC-2025-PATHFINDERCHALLENGES-01-04 - HORIZON-EIC HORIZON EIC Grants |
120000000 |
single-stage |
2025-07-24 |
2025-10-29 |
Descrizione
Scope:
Background and scope
Robotic automation offers significant advantages to several sectors, yet on-site construction robotics is amongst the most challenging and least understood fields in robotics. The unstructured, dynamic environment with human presence makes navigation and automation of the many concurrent construction tasks deeply challenging. Further, the current state-of-the-art solutions focus on adding higher degrees of automation to legacy tools, such as heavy equipment designed for diesel engines and human operators.
Radical innovations are essential for the sector to address the unprecedented wave of building growth, especially in the context of labour shortages, a productivity gap between the construction and other industries, rising expectations for occupational health and safety, and the need for healthier and more affordable living environments.
Through the collaboration of multiple agents (both humans and machines) construction processes can be accelerated, enabling more complex processes with multiple tasks to be performed simultaneously and collaboratively. Multi-robotic collaboration, where robotic agents support and complement each other’s tasks and skill sets within the same workspace, may unlock entirely new processes that are not possible using single robotic machines. This approach could involve multiple distributed “swarms” of collaborative robots using distributed control algorithms and robot learning systems, which may be better suited to large, spatially distributed tasks and can adapt to unpredictable environments. Doing so while also supporting the electrification of the (legacy suite of) construction equipment, will help break with the need to go for ever larger machines and facilitate the development of novel technologies that enable efficient accurate and reliable control, and the adoption of collaborative robots that are suitable for commercial on-site construction environments.
Realising the disruptive potential of novel emerging technology paradigms that reconsider construction processes from the fundamentals can help supplant and substitute the legacy suite of tools with novel autonomous collaborative construction robots in an integrated, “designed-for-robotics” digital production and assembly chain.
Such developments could also further enhance an emerging paradigm shift from today’s complex mix of on-site construction tasks, towards a future of off-site fabrication and on-site assembly. Off-site fabrication offers industrial economic advantages of producing modularized building elements at scale in a controlled, digitalized and automated factory environment. For the construction sector this paradigm shift can deliver demand-side emissions reductions, by implementing strategies of digitalized structural efficiency and novel materials, as well as of zeroemission construction sites through electrification.
This Pathfinder Challenge aims to address all construction tasks typically required for site preparation, substructure, and superstructure, as well as the coordination between 43 these tasks to support a transition towards building with autonomous electrified construction equipment. It includes the role of human agents in construction processes, as even high degrees of multi-robotic autonomy with low degrees of supervision will require a collaborative connection between human and robotic agents, ensuring they can safely collaborate and share the same workspace.
Specific objectives
The overall objective of this Challenge is the development of breakthrough technologies in the domain of autonomous collaborative on-site construction robots for an integrated, designed-for-robotics, digital production and assembly chain.
The Challenge is open to the 3 main construction tasks applied to the 2 main construction segments of buildings and infrastructure. Innovative application in adjacent construction segments (for example coastal protection foundations for energy infrastructure) also fall within scope.
Each funded project shall deliver the following 3 specific objectives:
Objective 1:
Development of a simplified structural, load-bearing, material-robot building system to assemble a representative and future-relevant structure (pavilion) using a multitude of discrete modules (elements, segments, blocks, voussoirs). This system must demonstrate TRL4 (validation in laboratory environment) of the autonomous collaborative multirobotic assembly. The structure can represent an infrastructure (for example a bridge, tunnel, culvert, conduit), a building (for example a tower, vault, dome, arch, multi-story skeleton, wall) or other construction elements (for example a foundation, secant wall, barrier, sea wall). The building system can also integrate unprocessed and pre-processed in-situ building materials (rocks, sand, natural materials, demolition materials, disassembled elements). Projects are expected to demonstrate the technologies at least at a relevant human scale in terms of volume, mass and moment of inertia, and ideally at a larger real-world architectural scale, rather than at a laboratory desktop scale.
Solutions are expected to incorporate “design-for-robotic-assembly” aspects, such as the robot-material interfaces, module interfaces and connectors, and may include innovative approaches such as embedded sensing in the modules.
A virtual simulation of the disassembled state, various intermediate assembly stages (including temporary (robotic) support measures if necessary) and final assembled state is expected to be part of the systems development process. The project should include a documented validation of key design decisions (for example materials used 44 or configurations that simulate scaled behaviour) against the minimal requirements of the TRL4 demonstration objectives of the autonomous mobile multi-robotic collaborative platform.
Objective 2:
Development of an autonomous mobile multi-robotic collaborative platform using at least two, preferably more, mutually aware collaborative robotic systems specifically designed for the assembly tasks outlined in Objective 1. This objective requires a structured systems engineering approach to conduct a thorough functional system analysis and to allocate system-level functions between humans and machines within the target autonomous mobile multi-robotic collaborative platform.
The design should include the definition of system states and modes, along with the transitions between them, to ensure safe autonomous operations and effective demonstration of robot-robot and human-robot collaborations and interactions (passive, active, adaptive) at TRL4.
The project should also describe how the proposed technology can be scaled to meet the full dimensions of the intended commercial application in future.
Utilizing existing industrial robots or modifying suitable existing construction tools is allowed. However, these approaches may face workspace limitations when scaled to full commercial dimensions. Conversely, novel relative multi-robotic platforms could make full use of the opportunities of the material-robot system independent of scaling limitations in future.
Objective 3:
Achieve a TRL4 demonstration of an autonomous assembly sequence using the demonstration building system developed in Objective 1, executed by the autonomous mobile multi-robotic collaborative platform developed in Objective 2. The demonstration of a subsequent disassembly sequence is optional but encouraged if the building system is designed for disassembly. The demonstration will take place in a laboratory environment, including tests that explore the system’s resilience and limits under controlled unstructured real-world conditions (for example fault tolerance, granular uneven surfaces, environmental obstacles). These tests aim to identify key weaknesses and recommend future technology developments.
The specific objective of this challenge is to advance the digitalized chain of off-site modular production with on-site autonomous mobile multi-robotic collaborative assembly. Therefore, on-site 3D-printing of cementitious materials or polymers as a primary construction task is outside the scope of this challenge.
Expected Outcomes and Impacts:
This Challenge contributes to the European Green Deal, the European AI Strategy, and the key strategic orientations of Horizon Europe for the digital and green transitions of the construction sector. The anticipated impacts of this Challenge include addressing likely shortages and competition in the labour markets, enhancing productivity and competitiveness within the construction industry, and improving worker safety. It will facilitate a shift towards offsite industrial fabrication coupled with onsite assembly and disassembly, reducing emissions from on-site construction activities, and lowering costs and mitigating risks associated with construction projects. This Challenge will also serve as a lighthouse for industrialization in important policy areas, such as affordable housing, the renovation wave, circular construction, and infrastructure development.
The field of mobile construction robotics, in particular heterogeneous collaborative robots assembling discrete building elements, is challenging and multi-disciplinary. Given the nascent state of the enabling technologies, the cumulative impact of the portfolio of Pathfinder projects is expected to surpass that of individual projects. Consortia will benefit from mutual learning and the exchange of approaches and expertise in areas such as mapping, navigating and building awareness of unstructured environments, force-aware manipulation, swarm collectives, as well as commercialisation pathways.
Furthermore, consortia will be encouraged to collaborate on developing performance metrics and communicate their outputs to the broader public with a view to accelerating the adoption of these radical innovations by the sector. Such valuable joint portfolio activities are anticipated to be discussed and agreed upon by the funded projects.
The portfolio of projects selected will aim to cover a complementary set of projects that span the “application” and “approach” fields specified below and combinations thereof:
- Applications fields (super-structure, sub-structure, site-preparation, building, infrastructure, other construction, target type of environment).
- Approach (type of robot, number of agents, coordination strategy, level of autonomy, strategy for stability during assembly sequence, multi-modal sensors, resilience strategy for environmental variability, type of discrete building elements and fixations, level of integration of material-robot system).
Specific conditions
Applications for this Challenge with elements that concern the evolution of European communication networks (5G, post-5G and other technologies linked to the evolution of European communication networks) will be subject to restriction for the protection of European communication networks (see Annex II – Section B1)
Aggiornamenti
Condizioni generali e documenti
General conditions
1. Admissibility and eligibility conditions:
In order to apply, your proposal must meet the general eligibility requirements (see Annex 2) as well as specific eligibility requirements for the Challenge (please see TOPIC DESCRIPTION above).
Please check for particular elements (e.g., specific application focus or technology) in the respective Challenge chapter.
The EIC Pathfinder Challenges support collaborative or individual research and innovation from consortia or from single legal entities established in a Member State or an Associated Country (unless stated otherwise in the specific Challenge chapter). In case of a consortium your proposal must be submitted by the coordinator on behalf of the consortium. Consortia of two entities must be comprised of independent legal entities from two different Member States or Associated Countries. Consortia of three or more entities must include as beneficiaries at least three legal entities, independent from each other and each established in a different country as follows:
- at least one legal entity established in a Member State; and
- at least two other independent legal entities, each established in different Member States or Associated Countries.
The legal entities may for example be universities, research organisations, SMEs, start-ups, natural persons. In the case of single beneficiary projects, mid-caps and larger companies will not be permitted.
Applications with elements that concern the evolution of European communication networks (5G, post-5G and other technologies linked to the evolution of European communication networks) will be subject to restriction for the protection of European communication networks (see Annex II – Section B1).
The standard admissibility and eligibility conditions and the eligibility of applicants from third countries are detailed in Annex 2.
Proposal page limit and layout:
Described in Part B of the Application Form available in the Submission System.
Sections 1 to 3 of the part B of your proposal, corresponding respectively to the evaluation criteria Excellence, Impact, and Quality and Efficiency of the Implementation, must consist of a maximum of 30 format A4 pages. Excess pages will be automatically made invisible, and will not be taken into consideration by the evaluators. Please also consult Annex 2 of the EIC Work Programme 2025.
3. Other Eligible Conditions
4. Financial and operational capacity and exclusion
5a. Evaluation and award: Award criteria, scoring and thresholds
5b. Evaluation and award: Submission and evaluation processes
5c. Evaluation and award: Indicative timeline for evaluation and grant agreement
6. Legal and financial set-up of the grants
Please refer to the Lump Sum Model Grant Agreement (Lump Sum MGA) used for Lump Sum EIC actions under Horizon Europe.
Call documents:
Additional documents:
Partecipazione
The submission system is planned to be opened on the date stated on the topic header.
Approfondimenti
Online Manual is your guide on the procedures from proposal submission to managing your grant.
Horizon Europe Programme Guide contains the detailed guidance to the structure, budget and political priorities of Horizon Europe.
Funding & Tenders Portal FAQ – find the answers to most frequently asked questions on submission of proposals, evaluation and grant management.
Research Enquiry Service – ask questions about any aspect of European research in general and the EU Research Framework Programmes in particular.
National Contact Points (NCPs) – get guidance, practical information and assistance on participation in Horizon Europe. There are also NCPs in many non-EU and non-associated countries (‘third-countries’).
Enterprise Europe Network – contact your EEN national contact for advice to businesses with special focus on SMEs. The support includes guidance on the EU research funding.
IT Helpdesk – contact the Funding & Tenders Portal IT helpdesk for questions such as forgotten passwords, access rights and roles, technical aspects of submission of proposals, etc.
European IPR Helpdesk assists you on intellectual property issues.
CEN-CENELEC Research Helpdesk and ETSI Research Helpdesk – the European Standards Organisations advise you how to tackle standardisation in your project proposal.
The European Charter for Researchers and the Code of Conduct for their recruitment – consult the general principles and requirements specifying the roles, responsibilities and entitlements of researchers, employers and funders of researchers.
Partner Search help you find a partner organisation for your proposal.